One of the issues facing U.S. voters when they go to the polls in early November is the future of tax policy. Technological innovations and booming stock and property markets have created incredible wealth.
Fifteen people are not worth more than $100 billion, and the number of U.S. billionaires has increased from sixty-six in 1990 to around 748 in 2023.
The former President favors lower taxes that he (and his party) believe will increase spending and economic growth through increased sales and tax revenues and higher incomes. His opponent, the current Vice President, favors increasing taxes on the wealthiest Americans, focusing on those with net worths above the $100 million level. The number of U.S. centi-millionaires has doubled since 2003 to 10,660.
Aside from increasing tax rates and eliminating deductions, the Vice President favors taxing unrealized gains for the wealthiest Americans. The Republican challenger favors lower taxes and has pledged to eliminate taxes on social security for all Americans.
The case for higher taxes
The unanticipated results
The case for lower taxes
The unanticipated results
Gridlock is the most likely outcome
In 1789, Benjamin Franklin, one of the U.S. Founding Fathers, said, “Nothing is certain except death and taxes.” Time will tell if the 2024 U.S. election will dramatically change the tax code or the growing debt level. In a country divided along political lines, the odds favor continued gridlock no matter who moves into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Candidates make many pledges during elections to gain votes, but there is always a wide gulf between what they promise and can deliver. No matter who you support, the reality is that the U.S. debt will likely continue to grow, and tax policy will not dramatically change.
Henry Clay, the U.S. Senator and Presidential candidate in the 1800s, knew that compromise was critical in politics, earning the nickname “The Great Compromiser.” Clay knew that in any compromise both sides walk away disappointed. The odds of a tax on unrealized gains are very low, while a compromise or the status quo is far more likely, given the significant range of unanticipated ramifications and vested interests on either side of the issue.
Thanks for reading, and stay tuned for the next edition of the Tradier Rundown!